REVIEW AND STUDY OF METAL COMPLEXES WITH ANTIFUNGAL POTENTIAL AGAINST Candida albicans STRAINS
Background: Candidiasis, caused mainly by Candida albicans yeast, is a pathology that affects a significant amount of people in the world, mainly women, thus being a public health issue. In addition, clinical practice has found it difficult to treat candidiasis for two reasons: the multidrug resistance associated with the exacerbated use of available drugs and the high number of side effects caused by current antifungal drugs. In this scenario, this work is a literature review on the antifungal activity of metal complexes against C. albicans since they are extensively studied for their varied applications in health sciences, as an object of study in the area of inorganic chemistry, in the subareas of bioinorganic chemistry and pharmaceutical chemistry. Aim: The present work consists of a literature review in electronic databases on the potential antifungal action against Candida albicans presented by metal complexes. Methods: Data was collected using the Capes, PubMed, Cochrane Reviews and Virtual Health Library (BVS) databases. Results: The results obtained through bibliographic surveys show the importance of studies of metal complexes against the strain of C. albicans, which have promising inhibitory activities and in some cases, with Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) values lower than 20µg/mL Discussion: The results obtained through bibliographic surveys show the importance of studies of metal complexes against the strain of C. albicans, which have promising inhibitory activities, and in some cases, with Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) values lower than 20µg/mL. Conclusion: Highlighting the activity performed by ruthenium complexes and Schiff bases when coordinated to metallic ions arouses great interest in a future study of a complex of this metal with a Schiff base in its coordination site.
Read ArticleUNRAVELING THE COMPLEXITIES OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE: A CONVERSATION WITH DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH (EXTENDED EN-US VERSION)
Background: This interview covers Dr. Peter McCullough’s medical career, experience as an editor of medical journals, and his expertise in areas such as cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, and pericarditis. Aims: The primary aim is to understand Dr. McCullough’s perspectives on various medical topics, including his journey as a cardiologist, the importance of peer review, the phenomenon of Pheidippides cardiomyopathy, the differences between myocarditis and pericarditis, and the significance of ethical principles like the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki. Additionally, the interview aims to explore his concerns about censorship during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The interview follows a question-and-answer format, with the interviewer posing questions to Dr. McCullough on various topics related to his medical career, research interests, and ethical considerations. Results: Dr. McCullough shares his insights on topics such as cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, and pericarditis, emphasizing the importance of peer review, identifying potential biases, and balancing scientific rigor with timely dissemination of findings. He also highlights the significance of the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki in ensuring informed consent and preventing coercion in medical research and treatment. Discussion: Dr. McCullough expresses concerns about censorship during the COVID-19 pandemic, which he believes impacted the ability of medical professionals to freely discuss and disseminate health-related information. He also discusses the potential role of COVID-19 vaccines in causing myocarditis and the need for transparent communication about treatment options and potential complications. Conclusion: The interview provides valuable insights from Dr. McCullough’s extensive medical experience and expertise, covering a range of topics from cardiovascular conditions to ethical principles and the challenges posed by censorship during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Read ArticleSTATISTICAL VALIDATION OF TRIPLE COLOCALIZATION ANALYSIS
Background: in the last decades, colocalization analysis of fluorescently tagged biomolecules has proven to be a powerful approach to studying functional relationships between these biomolecules. However, in many cases, to give this analysis a biological meaning, colocalization coefficients must be tested statistically, comparing them with the colocalization expected by chance. Aim: It addressed the statistical significance of triple colocalization to distinguish real triple colocalization and classify different triple signal scenarios. Methods: we use biological and generated images of triple signal scenarios to contrast seven independent statistical facts with independent statistical tests. Three of these tests correspond to pairwise relationships (double scrambling tests), and the others correspond to triple relationships: single scrambling tests (red, green, and blue scrambling) and the triple scrambling test. The analysis and methodology proposed can be reproduced using the application developed in our laboratory. Results: In the study approach, we found true triple relationships ignored by using traditional methods of computing the statistical significance, while we could reinterpret cases of not significant triple colocalization wrongly considered as significant by traditional methods. Discussion: single scrambling tests can reveal significant triple colocalization for low levels of triple co-occurrence, even when all pairwise relationships were exclusion relationships. Moreover, on the other hand, single scrambling tests can reveal the absence of a significant triple colocalization for high levels of triple co-occurrence, even when all pairwise relationships were significant colocalization. Conclusion: all scrambling tests are useful to classify a specific scenario of a triple relationship. Dynamics like mitosis can be distinguished into their phases by triple signal relationships using these 7 independent statistical tests.
Read Article